Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 22073
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Here is a list and Reagan's not on it Pit. There are other lists of the 10 worst Presidents and Reagan is not on any of them. Come out of your delusion. So some family and friends got laid off because the steel industry collapsed. That doesn't make Reagan the worst President. It just makes him the worst TO YOU.
Oh so now you believe the liberal media :) They did not even get Nixon right .The worst thing Nixon did was declare the war on drugs . IMO Watergate was a creation of his machine
No, the worst thing he did was closing the gold window.
Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 22073
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Here is a list and Reagan's not on it Pit. There are other lists of the 10 worst Presidents and Reagan is not on any of them. Come out of your delusion. So some family and friends got laid off because the steel industry collapsed. That doesn't make Reagan the worst President. It just makes him the worst TO YOU.
Oh so now you believe the liberal media :) They did not even get Nixon right .The worst thing Nixon did was declare the war on drugs . IMO Watergate was a creation of his machine
The point is, I can poduce 10 different "worst President's" lists and Ronald Reagan will not be on any of them.
I'm simply asking you to stake a step back and realize that, while you hate him (and perhaps have reason to hate him), he was NOT even close to the worst President.
Simple.
While i know we have never had this conversation :)
Because some nut on the Internet says otherwise does not mean that this is the case. As I said I've produced lists from high level people regarding the worst Presidents, Reagan's not on any of them. Give up your fantasy.
You only make yourself look bad ever time you make such a foolish and outlandish claim.
I'm done.
Ronald Ragan opened American steel producers up to unfair competition ,no environmental constraints or no workers rights for non American producers. Go to any old steel town witness first hand the devastation Ronald Reagan produced
So, living up to your standards means being "fair" no matter how stupid those standards may be?
Join date: May 2005
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 7924
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Here is a list and Reagan's not on it Pit. There are other lists of the 10 worst Presidents and Reagan is not on any of them. Come out of your delusion. So some family and friends got laid off because the steel industry collapsed. That doesn't make Reagan the worst President. It just makes him the worst TO YOU.
Oh so now you believe the liberal media :) They did not even get Nixon right .The worst thing Nixon did was declare the war on drugs . IMO Watergate was a creation of his machine
The point is, I can poduce 10 different "worst President's" lists and Ronald Reagan will not be on any of them.
I'm simply asking you to stake a step back and realize that, while you hate him (and perhaps have reason to hate him), he was NOT even close to the worst President.
Simple.
While i know we have never had this conversation :)
Because some nut on the Internet says otherwise does not mean that this is the case. As I said I've produced lists from high level people regarding the worst Presidents, Reagan's not on any of them. Give up your fantasy.
You only make yourself look bad ever time you make such a foolish and outlandish claim.
I'm done.
Ronald Ragan opened American steel producers up to unfair competition ,no environmental constraints or no workers rights for non American producers. Go to any old steel town witness first hand the devastation Ronald Reagan produced
You've just proven my point -- Thank you!
Finally.
I am sorry you are going to have to explain your point
Yeah, how foolish to think that the Reagan tax breaks that put money into the hands of everyone, including those that start and run businesses could have spurred an economic comeback. We all know that our money is best used when it is given to the government...
(eye roll)[/quote]
I am eye rolling your straw man argument. You are well trained.
Join date: May 2005
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 7924
orion wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Here is a list and Reagan's not on it Pit. There are other lists of the 10 worst Presidents and Reagan is not on any of them. Come out of your delusion. So some family and friends got laid off because the steel industry collapsed. That doesn't make Reagan the worst President. It just makes him the worst TO YOU.
Oh so now you believe the liberal media :) They did not even get Nixon right .The worst thing Nixon did was declare the war on drugs . IMO Watergate was a creation of his machine
The point is, I can poduce 10 different "worst President's" lists and Ronald Reagan will not be on any of them.
I'm simply asking you to stake a step back and realize that, while you hate him (and perhaps have reason to hate him), he was NOT even close to the worst President.
Simple.
While i know we have never had this conversation :)
Because some nut on the Internet says otherwise does not mean that this is the case. As I said I've produced lists from high level people regarding the worst Presidents, Reagan's not on any of them. Give up your fantasy.
You only make yourself look bad ever time you make such a foolish and outlandish claim.
I'm done.
Ronald Ragan opened American steel producers up to unfair competition ,no environmental constraints or no workers rights for non American producers. Go to any old steel town witness first hand the devastation Ronald Reagan produced
So, living up to your standards means being "fair" no matter how stupid those standards may be?
No, thank you.
The answer is yes , I personally do not think environmental regulations are all bad. To make American companies comply with American law and not make some one that has no standard is unfair to American companies. If some one does not comply with an American standard on environmental issues then when their product hits the American market , it should be taxed so there is a level playing field
Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 22073
pittbulll wrote:
orion wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Here is a list and Reagan's not on it Pit. There are other lists of the 10 worst Presidents and Reagan is not on any of them. Come out of your delusion. So some family and friends got laid off because the steel industry collapsed. That doesn't make Reagan the worst President. It just makes him the worst TO YOU.
Oh so now you believe the liberal media :) They did not even get Nixon right .The worst thing Nixon did was declare the war on drugs . IMO Watergate was a creation of his machine
The point is, I can poduce 10 different "worst President's" lists and Ronald Reagan will not be on any of them.
I'm simply asking you to stake a step back and realize that, while you hate him (and perhaps have reason to hate him), he was NOT even close to the worst President.
Simple.
While i know we have never had this conversation :)
Because some nut on the Internet says otherwise does not mean that this is the case. As I said I've produced lists from high level people regarding the worst Presidents, Reagan's not on any of them. Give up your fantasy.
You only make yourself look bad ever time you make such a foolish and outlandish claim.
I'm done.
Ronald Ragan opened American steel producers up to unfair competition ,no environmental constraints or no workers rights for non American producers. Go to any old steel town witness first hand the devastation Ronald Reagan produced
So, living up to your standards means being "fair" no matter how stupid those standards may be?
No, thank you.
The answer is yes , I personally do not think environmental regulations are all bad. To make American companies comply with American law and not make some one that has no standard is unfair to American companies. If some one does not comply with an American standard on environmental issues then when their product hits the American market , it should be taxed so there is a level playing field
Sweet.
And what would hinder us or the Chinese to make up equally arbitrary standards your products have to meet before they can be sold at our markets?
After all, we are not the Middle East, we hardly have to put up with your bullshit.
Oh yes, please, start a trade war, you industrial juggernaut....
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Yeah, I can't wait for someone to ask him about that in a debate...oh wait....they won't.
Why would anyone ask him about that or anything else concerning Ron Paul? This race is over Mitt Romney is going to be the nominee.
How do you like that?
How do you like Obama?
Don't lie, we all know your brand of fake conservatism who supported him in 2008 and also now in 2012.
I voted against Obama in 08 and will again in 2012. We've never had as far left a President as Obama. And if you think Romney is the same as Obama you have even worse political instincts than I originally thought. But then again you actually believed Paul had a chance so who knows what's going on in that noggin of yours.
But..yeah Romney IS going to be the nominee, just as I predicted.
Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 22073
ZEB wrote:
And Paul is in last place just as I predicted.
How does that feel?
Hilarious, because you fail to mention all the people that dropped out and that Romneys main competition is a religious nutjob and a a guy who has an ego the size of the satellite he wants to build a state on.
Join date: May 2005
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 7924
orion wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
ZEB wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Yeah, I can't wait for someone to ask him about that in a debate...oh wait....they won't.
Why would anyone ask him about that or anything else concerning Ron Paul? This race is over Mitt Romney is going to be the nominee.
How do you like that?
How do you like Obama?
Don't lie, we all know your brand of fake conservatism who supported him in 2008 and also now in 2012.
I will vote the lesser of all evils
1 Paul
2 Obama
3 Romney
Guided by your gag reflex?
Because thats what it would like if I used mine.
I would have to agree , I have been voting the lesser of the evils so long that I have not realized how dissatified I am with Obama. I voted for change and could not tell the difference between Bush and Obama and if Romney is elected you will not tell the difference between he and Obama
