Building High-Performance Muscle™
Politics and World Issues
 
Learning About Obama Care
 

orion
Level 5

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 24421

silee wrote:


I smell a rat and not someone and rats run in packs.


At this point, I dont even trust your sense of smell.

  Report
 

silee
Level 1

Join date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 258

benos4752 wrote:
silee wrote:
I smell a rat and not someone and rats run in packs. There was nothing wrong with my understanding. My point was and is that Roe V Wade gave the women the right to choose. That doesn't mean as your fellow pack rat said its about abortion. Its a subtle point and yes abortion would be recognized as federally legal the law of the land, but from that it doesn't follow that it a woman lived in a state where it wasn't legal and if conditions arose where she deemed in necessary for abortion services then she wouldn't have to be in fear of breaking the law and she wouldn't have to travel to a state that it was or be in trouble with the law since she is a resident of the state where it wasn't legal. . The most you could say is my understanding didn't go far enough for your like, and that's fair enough. I am sure that if we had an in dept scholarly written paper we would find out more facts but due to the structure of this forum and who the hell is going to read a length piece here come on dude ....
Is it heat rather than light you want? What type of framing was in your family, are they still working the land? what's the nature of their farming these days?


Should I quote you again?

silee wrote:
And roe v wade was about giving women the right to choose. Abortion was illegal before 1973 and its now the law of American land. choosing is an option but prior to 1973 there was no option. Then it was illegal. And as it is there are certain time limitations the court placed on it.


Regardless of what you MEANT, that is what you said. So either A, you knew what you were saying was incorrect and were flat out lying in order to try to strengthen your political opinion because you knew your opinion didn't have two legs to stand on. B, you lack an accurate understanding of the subject and should try to do a little bit of reading to increase your understanding of something before joining a conversation. Or C, learn to proofread so that you say what you mean instead of spouting out pure inaccuracies because you lack the mental comprehension to form a coherent sentence.






As far as my family. Name it, someones probably grown it..apples, tomatoes, grapes, olives, peppers, alfalfa, grass, sweet potatoes, etc...All but one great uncle who's transitioned into real estate, and a few nephews, yes, still farming. Everything to selling tomatoes to Del Monte and Heinz to selling hay through brokers to having small roadside stands.




nah i wasn't lying, and nah there's a subtle difference between having a right to( abortion) but not do it. It was about a point of emphasis. I expanded on what I meant. I'll leave it at that. That criticism about having everything right before posting is nonsense, no one has everything right the first time and besides its a "dialogue" not a thesis so cut me some slack dude.
So now with every thing you post here I'll be expecting to see a complete understanding or you'll be hoisted on your own petard.

  Report
 

orion
Level 5

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 24421

...

  Report