The Intelligent & Relentless Pursuit of Muscle™
Steroids
 
Liquid Dianabol vs Oral Dianabol
1
 

batista2113
Level

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 6

Is it true that liquid dianabol is better than oral?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Cortes
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 7145

Why on earth would one dianabol be any better or worse than another dianabol? And for the record, liquid dianabol IS an oral.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

batista2113
Level

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 6

I just wanted to know so i just asked.OK?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

JonEightPackGuy
Level 1

Join date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 2421

Oral is harder on your liver.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Brook
Level

Join date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 4262

JonEightPackGuy wrote:
Oral is harder on your liver.


Orally ingested 17AA steroids are just as toxic as injected 17AA steroids.

If this poster is actually comparing the injectable and oral forms of dbol of course - i suspect they are comparing two oral products. One in tablet/capsule form and the other suspended in liquid.

Either way the answer is the same.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Cortes
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 7145

JonEightPackGuy wrote:
Oral is harder on your liver.


...than what?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

ParagonA
Level 100

Join date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 704

By liquid you mean injectable? I don't know if there is a liquid oral Methandrostenolone (=Dbol) product.

I think there are injectable Methandrostenolone products on the market, though (Refrovit-B, Ganabol).

Oral Dbol is modyfied at its (postion) 17-carbon atom. This to survive the liver first pass and make it to the blood stream. This makes it liver toxic.

So if you inject Methandrostenolone, this will be "better" for your liver. Therefore, yes, injectable Dbol is better than the oral version.

However, IF you are not affrais of injections, there are much better choices than Methandrostenolone, imo. The good thing about Dbol is, that it's a well-working steroid with moderate side-effects and that you do not have to inject it.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

winkroar3
Level

Join date: Aug 2008
Location:
Posts: 527

The oral and injectable versions of Dbol are exactly the same. The liquid is an oil based injectable that usually comes in 25-50mg/ml strength. I suppose the confusion is coming from the fact that the oil based product is 17Aa alkalated as well, making it orally effective. So it stands to reason if the injectable is
orally ingested it is just as liver toxic as the tablet (doses being equal).

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Brook
Level

Join date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 4262

ParagonA wrote:
By liquid you mean injectable? I don't know if there is a liquid oral Methandrostenolone (=Dbol) product.

I think there are injectable Methandrostenolone products on the market, though (Refrovit-B, Ganabol).

Oral Dbol is modyfied at its (postion) 17-carbon atom. This to survive the liver first pass and make it to the blood stream. This makes it liver toxic.

So if you inject Methandrostenolone, this will be "better" for your liver. Therefore, yes, injectable Dbol is better than the oral version.

However, IF you are not affrais of injections, there are much better choices than Methandrostenolone, imo. The good thing about Dbol is, that it's a well-working steroid with moderate side-effects and that you do not have to inject it.


Ganabol is also boldenone Undec, so make sure you know which version you have..
As i previously mentioned, injectable Methandrostenolone is also 17AA - similar to Winstrol Depot in this regard.

Lastly - yes, there are places to buy suspended liquid orals - UG only of course (other than Winstrol Depot which despite being an injectable prep, it is orally bio-available too).

JJ

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

whotookmyname
Level

Join date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 692

Brook wrote:
<snip>

Lastly - yes, there are places to buy suspended liquid orals - UG only of course (other than Winstrol Depot which despite being an injectable prep, it is orally bio-available too).

JJ


Exactly. The average UG lab doesn't have access to a pill press, hence the prevalence of liquid dbol. I suspect that's what led to the OP's confusion / question.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

ericcartman
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 83

Yes Dbol liquid and Dbol tabs are both orally bioavailable. Given both options I would go with tabs because they are much more convenient for easy and accurate dosing throughout the day. Also if you have a sensitive palate (which I thankfully do not) you will see that liquid Dbol (Reforvit B) tastes terrible. By comparison FWIW, Winstrol Depot tastes fairly neutral.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Bicep_craze
Level

Join date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1521

Cortes wrote:
Why on earth would one dianabol be any better or worse than another dianabol? And for the record, liquid dianabol IS an oral.


x2

liquid dianabol is methylated too so u can drink it straight.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

DaJa
Level

Join date: Apr 2010
Location:
Posts: 247

its whatever you prefer. I've heard liquid dbol is more potent than the tabs/caps due to alot of labs under-dosing their tabs. suspended in liquid your dbol will most likely be more accurate mg/ml. but not everyone wants to pull out a needle-less syringe tube and suck down .25ml every 3-4hrs. personaly I get liquid do to the dosing being more accurate but if you trust your source's tabs, tabs would be much easier on the go -but dbol is dbol.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

BONEZ217
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 11473

The potency of a ugl preparation has nothing to do with the type (liquid or tab) and everything to do with the integrity and the manufacturing ability of the UGL. Most people arent getting their UGL stuff independantly tested so it's pretty pointless to generalize.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Lover95
Level

Join date: Jun 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 275

I think injected alkylated steroids would cause less liver stress because theyd be metabolized outside the lived in before reaching the liver. Why do people inject oral steroids, is it just increased effectiveness per mg? It seems common for winstrol.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Bill Roberts
Level 5

Join date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 8669

There can be absorption issues as well as liver metabolism issues.

Winstrol has pretty good oral absorption as well as bioavailability, so there is not a major efficiency advantage in injecting it. But there is something: another 25-50% as an estimate.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

BONEZ217
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 11473

Bill Roberts wrote:
There can be absorption issues as well as liver metabolism issues.

Winstrol has pretty good oral absorption as well as bioavailability, so there is not a major efficiency advantage in injecting it. But there is something: another 25-50% as an estimate.



Can you explain that last sentence. You lost me.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Lover95
Level

Join date: Jun 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 275

BONEZ217 wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
There can be absorption issues as well as liver metabolism issues.

Winstrol has pretty good oral absorption as well as bioavailability, so there is not a major efficiency advantage in injecting it. But there is something: another 25-50% as an estimate.



Can you explain that last sentence. You lost me.


Mg I guessing. I'm good at making sense of sentences without clear subjects.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
1
Topic is Locked
This thread has reached its maximum number of replies. Click HERE to start a new topic.