Article Discussions
5 Programming Strategies for Quick Results
1 2 Next Last
 

T NATION
Moderator

Join date: May 1998
Location:
Posts: 10307

5 Programming Strategies for Quick Results
by Eric Cressey
04/02/08

Five innovative training strategies from Eric Cressey, including some counterintuitive ab work, a novel bench routine, some single leg movements, a better box squat, and some benching with lumber.

  Report
 

general_lfl
Level 0

Join date: Oct 2003
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 161

Eric:

When incorporating single-leg movements, is there a bodyweight-only protocol I can use? I think this would be great for extra workouts.

Thanks

  Report
 

tw0scoops2
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 897

How can you say our finger paintings aren't special...I know you haven't seen mine! :-D

  Report
 

tw0scoops2
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 897

In all seriousness though, "work up to a 1 RM"? Are you saying to do singles up until you hit your max? Or 2 reps per set, or 3?

  Report
 

mehrdeutig
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 25

"Day 3: Cressey split-squat isometric holds

Yes, I named an exercise after myself because I'm freakin' brilliant."

Ha!

  Report
 

Coach Clarke
Level 3

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 129

I caught the Cal Poly t-shirt in those pictures...
Go Mustangs!

  Report
 

vbm537
Level 4

Join date: Jan 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 547

Coach Clarke wrote:
I caught the Cal Poly t-shirt in those pictures...
Go Mustangs!


I went to Cal Poly so I caught the shirt as well. Nice to see us represented in the article!

Oh yeah...and great info too.

  Report
 

DeadlySting81
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 88

EC,

Regarding the Pallof Press isometric holds, are there times/cases where you'd recommend adding in arm movement while resisting rotation? Also, would you recommend that the bulk of abdominal training be of this stabilization variety versus lots of dynamic movements involving lots of spinal flexion?

For those with sufficient stability, would a small number of sets no more than 2-3 times per week be too much repetitive flexion or probably a safe bet?

I've also been wondering the same thing about nexk training and whether I should focus solely on preventing motion or if I should also include more dynamic work. What are your general thoughts on neck training, specifically flexion and extension, as well as the best methods for training the neck.

Thanks for your time and help!

  Report
 

Genghis
Level 2

Join date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 49

What do you think of DE work for guys that are interested in getting bigger/stronger in that order?

  Report
 

stallion
Level 0

Join date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1120

How many lifters have done that bench routine, and what were their results?

I would prefer real exercises like squats, front squats etc. anyday before these single leg exercises.



I might sound like an old whiny chimp, but I think one should stick to the basics.

Actually I do only use three exercises in my training these days:

- Front Squats
- Benchpress
- Bent Rows

Of course i don't do it like this all year round.

It is only my point that people would get better gains if they did 5 brutal sets of squats than doing 2 or 3 exercises with some kind of isometric bosuball single-leg squats.

I see that the technicality and advanced training methods are running rampant. Many forumites are all the time looking for the silver bullet, and forgetting that it is the assbusting work in the gym that brings the results, not any eccentric-one arm barbell curls or bosu ball stabilization exercise.


This is no discredit to Eric Cressey, as he has my deepest respect, I just think that the gizmos and the advancedness sometimes just get too much attention, and that people forget the real deal.

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

general_lfl wrote:
Eric:

When incorporating single-leg movements, is there a bodyweight-only protocol I can use? I think this would be great for extra workouts.

Thanks


Absolutely - on off-days, we often have guys do body-weight only:

-reverse lunges
-walking lunges
-step-ups
-alternating lateral lunges
-slideboard reverse lunges
-forward lunges
-split squats
-Bulgarian split squats

www.EricCressey.com

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

tw0scoops2 wrote:
In all seriousness though, "work up to a 1 RM"? Are you saying to do singles up until you hit your max? Or 2 reps per set, or 3?


Singles until you hit a max.

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

Coach Clarke wrote:
I caught the Cal Poly t-shirt in those pictures...
Go Mustangs!


Danny's a poser; he went to Holy Cross.

(Then again, I'm wearing UCONN shorts and a Vanderbilt shirt right now)

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

DvilleVoltigeurs wrote:
EC,

Regarding the Pallof Press isometric holds, are there times/cases where you'd recommend adding in arm movement while resisting rotation?


Yes, we do actual reps as well - just not as often.

Also, would you recommend that the bulk of abdominal training be of this stabilization variety versus lots of dynamic movements involving lots of spinal flexion?


We do very little flexion work.

For those with sufficient stability, would a small number of sets no more than 2-3 times per week be too much repetitive flexion or probably a safe bet?


Depends on the person. Could royally screw up a cyclist, for instance, as he spends a lot of time in flexion.

I've also been wondering the same thing about nexk training and whether I should focus solely on preventing motion or if I should also include more dynamic work. What are your general thoughts on neck training, specifically flexion and extension, as well as the best methods for training the neck.


Necks are different. You really need to build stability, but a lot of people have insufficient ROM in certain planes.

www.EricCressey.Blogspot.com

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

Genghis wrote:
What do you think of DE work for guys that are interested in getting bigger/stronger in that order?


Not the foremost priority, but it'll never hurt to be able to lift a weight fast. It can be very valuable for people who are too weak for their cross-sectional area, though.

www.EricCressey.com

  Report
 

hatfiejt
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 25

Great ideas. Love the ab program based on stabilization (abs weren't invented for crunches.)

One question: "How does board pressing constitute a full range of motion?"

  Report
 

hatfiejt
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 25

stallion wrote:
...I might sound like an old whiny chimp, but I think one should stick to the basics....


I agree with everything you said. Matter of fact, I do a similar simple-yet-assbusting routine. However, I think the aim of this article is more of a variety-based-hypertrophy or plateau-breaking plan than anything else. Not intended for your bread-and-butter workout (I-love-hyphens)

Hell, you can't write a daily article about "Squat, Bench, Pull... Heavy." They would put themselves out of a job.

  Report
 

Kettleer
Level 1

Join date: Jan 2008
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 4

stallion wrote:
I would prefer real exercises like squats, front squats etc. anyday before these single leg exercises.


I don't think the single leg are less "real". Ya, you lose less weight but that does not make it less real. I use some of these like the split squats, 1 legged deads and reverse lunges and they are just as punishing if not more due to the stability you are forced to use. Also, you don't run and (rarely) jump with two legs at a time, so unilateral work is very beneficial for athletes.

  Report
 

hatfiejt
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 25

Kettleer wrote:
1 legged deads and reverse lunges...are just as punishing if not more due to the stability you are forced to use.


True, but this means you using (wasting) more energy on balance and stabilization, therefor there is less stress on the targetted muscle group. Like squatting on a wobble board; you have reduced tension on the quads, hams, and glutes because you are trying like hell to stay balanced and not look stupid (impossible.)

Good supplemental balance/mobility training for athletes, but I wouldn't couple it with the phrase "Quick Results" (If by results you mean size and strength.)

  Report
 

stallion
Level 0

Join date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1120

hatfiejt wrote:
stallion wrote:
...I might sound like an old whiny chimp, but I think one should stick to the basics....

I agree with everything you said. Matter of fact, I do a similar simple-yet-assbusting routine. However, I think the aim of this article is more of a variety-based-hypertrophy or plateau-breaking plan than anything else. Not intended for your bread-and-butter workout (I-love-hyphens)

Hell, you can't write a daily article about "Squat, Bench, Pull... Heavy." They would put themselves out of a job.


Yes, of course.

I see that Eric Cressey ignored my post, and I think you summed it up just as nicely, so he wouldn't need to comment on that! :)

Regarding single leg work I guess it is all about what your goals are. If the goal is to lift heavy in a powerlifting competition, it is not of much use, but if you are an athlete it is another case.

I have performed a lot of single leg exercises, and the most brutal must be the bulgarian squat. Doing this one with a full range of motion, and working it very hard made me a nice headache and I puked as well. As a seasoned lifter I am no stranger to pain and hard work, but bulgarian squats is rated higher than squats and front squats on the pain level for me. But this does not mean I should do a lot of such work to become a stronger squatter.

I am pretty confident that Eric Cressey does mostly compound exercises himself.

  Report
 

DeadlySting81
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 88

Eric Cressey wrote:
We do very little flexion work.


I realize that you work primarily with athletes, but do you think it is possible for a bodybuilder to build a stage-ready midsection through diet, predominant use of progressively more challenging stabilization exercises over dynamic ab work, and very limited amounts of flexion work?


Eric Cressey wrote:
Necks are different. You really need to build stability, but a lot of people have insufficient ROM in certain planes.


I do not want to clog up your thread, but are there any resources you'd recommend/places you'd refer me to for more insight into how best to incorporate neck training into a program as well as determine what types of things need to be prioritized?

Thanks again.

  Report
 

Doug Adams
Level 4

Join date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 4867

To the posters who think EC is trying to sway people away from the basics:

"....To that end, you likely don't need anything remarkable on the programming front. The name of the game is subtle adjustments. With that in mind, here are a few to try out".

Read much people? If what you're doing is helping you reach your goals and are pain free, keep on with what you're doing. However, if you're giving your sessions your best effort and still aren't getting results, these ADJUSTMENTS might be worth a try.

I starting to think something needs to be written in big bold letters at the top of the articles that describes who it is intended for, such as:

Category: Sport Training/Bodybuilding/Corrective Exercise/etc.

Experience level of lifters whom this will most help: Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

stallion wrote:
hatfiejt wrote:
stallion wrote:
...I might sound like an old whiny chimp, but I think one should stick to the basics....

I agree with everything you said. Matter of fact, I do a similar simple-yet-assbusting routine. However, I think the aim of this article is more of a variety-based-hypertrophy or plateau-breaking plan than anything else. Not intended for your bread-and-butter workout (I-love-hyphens)

Hell, you can't write a daily article about "Squat, Bench, Pull... Heavy." They would put themselves out of a job.

Yes, of course.

I see that Eric Cressey ignored my post, and I think you summed it up just as nicely, so he wouldn't need to comment on that! :)


I didn't ignore you. Just have a lot of stuff going on - and I have a policy:

When I don't agree with something someone says on the internet, I don't comment/reply right away. I sit on it for 12-24 hours so that I don't say anything in haste that could be misinterpreted and cause conflict.

You would be surprised: I could probably write 20 articles on Squat/Bench/Pull heavy and TC would publish each of 'em as long as I didn't get in my own way.

As for your programming, anything works for a short period of time. I've front-squatted 3x/week with great results for a month at a time. By that same token, I credit single leg work with a lot of my improvements with deadlifting over the years.

What I can tell you is that people are more jacked up than you think. Pretty much everyone that walks through my door for the first time has several things wrong with them - and that isn't just because I'm a corrective exercise guy and they come to me for it. It's because they genuinely move like crap - and this includes newbies, advanced lifters, and even elite athletes (the last group might even be the worst). Single-leg movements help fix these problems - and for many people, it allows them to train around existing problems.

As a frame of reference, if you tweaked your back today and couldn't front squat for the next 3-4 weeks, I'd be willing to bet that single-leg work would be a lot more appealing pretty quickly.

I am pretty confident that Eric Cressey does mostly compound exercises himself.


And you're correct - as do my clients. However, single-leg work plays a huge role in our programming regardless of goal, body type, and injury history.

Hopefully that clears it up. If you think I need to write about this stuff to pay my bills, you're sorely mistaken; I'm doing just fine. ;)

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

hatfiejt wrote:
Great ideas. Love the ab program based on stabilization (abs weren't invented for crunches.)

One question: "How does board pressing constitute a full range of motion?"


Never claimed that it "constituted" full range of motion. Might want to reread that portion. ;)

  Report
 

Eric Cressey
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6857

hatfiejt wrote:
Kettleer wrote:
1 legged deads and reverse lunges...are just as punishing if not more due to the stability you are forced to use.

True, but this means you using (wasting) more energy on balance and stabilization, therefor there is less stress on the targetted muscle group. Like squatting on a wobble board; you have reduced tension on the quads, hams, and glutes because you are trying like hell to stay balanced and not look stupid (impossible.)

Good supplemental balance/mobility training for athletes, but I wouldn't couple it with the phrase "Quick Results" (If by results you mean size and strength.)


Comparing a wobble board exercise to a single-leg movement on a stable surface is apples and oranges. I spent three years of my life studying this; trust me!

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/..._RVAbstractPlus

  Report
1 2 Next Last
Topic is Locked
This thread is no longer open to replies. Click HERE to start a new topic.