|
Mutsahan,
Thanks for compliments.
Overall, I have a moderate sensitivity to carbs. I used to be quite overweight (300 plus lbs. and north of 25% body fat...I'm a former football lineman in which a higher level of body weight and body fat were required). However, as I've leaned down (I iniially dropped from 300 lbs. down to 220 lbs. in about 6 months, 4 years ago), I've drastically improved my carb tolerance, BUT if I don't watch it, I'll gain the weight and fat back very quickly.
I feel part of this is genetically predetermined (my mother's side of the family are all large and in charge :). Granted, a large part of this is due to lifestyle, but they all are naturally heavier, especially below the waist.
The other supps I was, and am still currently taking were:
Grow!, Low Carb Metabolic Drive, Curcumin, FA3 (9 per day), Flameout (4-6 per day), Rez-V, Superfood, MAG-10 pulses (or as a meal replacement from time to time), Poliquin Primal Fiber (the last few weeks of dieting), Phospha tidyl serine, and glycine....Taking a ton of supps...hence the level 5 status.
**A lot of people think I do steroids, but if they came and lived with me for a day, they would see how much effot I put into my training, and especially my nutrition and supplementation. The fact is, if I were taking drugs, I wouldn't lie about it, especially not on this site.
My basic nutrition plan was as follows:
When gaining:
6-7 meals per day (one of which was the protocol)
300-375 grams of protein per day, depending on carb intake (higher on lower days, and vice versa)...aimed for about 35-45% of total caloric intake
varied carb intake according to training day (higher on tough workout days)...intake was never more than 40% of total calories...I've found anything higher than this leads to, too much fat gain (carb sensitive)
Fat: varied according to training day (lower on higher carb days)...varied between 25-35% of total intake
Cals: varied according to trainin day (my maintenance intake is about 3,300-3,500, so I beed to take in just over 4000 to gain at a modest rate, while limiting fat gain)
When focusing on fat loss: Too long to post :)
My training generally consisted of a specialization approach utilizing the concepts of HTH and the program outline of I, BB. I know my body quite well, and made some modifications to the I, BB program, although, they were very small changes. The movement patterns and exercises were the about the same. I just tweaked the mechanics slighty for some of the movements, and occassionally substituted certain exercises.
I've always trained explosively and utilized the ramping/force spectrum concepts from my days as an explosive-power athlete while playing football. This has always worked well for me. I have used many other training styles, with success, but none of them yielded the type of strength, size, and body comp improvements, I get when utilizing higher loads, volume (as it relates to a lot of heavy sets), and low rep ranges (typically less than 5 reps per set...most of the time, I'd use 3 reps per set). I've found personally that anything more than 3 reps per set, and you're focus on explosiveness drops off dramatically.
The major difference involved with my training while on the protocol, was the brisk workout pace, even when using such a high pecentage of my 1 RM. I recovered insanely fast between sets (something that was never a stong point of mine...I've got a sensitive nervous system overall),and really increased the density of my workouts, which lead to an increase in hormone production, and kept my body fat levels moderately low (never above 10-11%), even when consuming a high amount of calories.
I didn't do ONE MINUTE of cardio, and had 2-3 cheat meals per week....timed so I had them within a couple hours of my toughest workouts of the week.
I'll shut up now...you probably already stopped reading :)
If you have the ability to purchase and utilize the protocol, go for it. Try it out.....train your ass off, work even harder in the kitchen, and you'll make huge positive strides in both your performance and your physique.
|