Bodybuilding Training
Weighted Dips as Primary Pecs Exercise
1 2 Next Last
 

winkel
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 94

Any issue with this?

I mostly train alone and going to failure on weighted dips is much safer than getting stuck under a barbell. There are no power cages in my gym.

Current pecs routine (preceded by biceps):

Weighted leaning forward dips (5x5)
Incline HS press (3x8-12)
Flies or pec deck (3x10-15)

And no, replacing dips with a DB press variant is also not an option since the gym only has dumbbells up to 90lbs.

I'm shoulder and tricep dominant and I'm looking to beef up my chest so suggestions would be very welcome.

  Report
 

belligerent
Level 1

Join date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 2262

Dips go a long way. I think you can get close to your potential doing nothing other than dips and chinups. Dips may not develop your chest as rapidly as other pushing movements but they will eventually get you there.

  Report
 

Clown Face
Level 1

Join date: Oct 2008
Location: England
Posts: 292

I really feel the dips in my chest after the set.

But my sternum becomes really tight (under the middle pec line) when I add this exercise into my workouts. Its really discomforting and annoying as hell.

So I don't do it anymore.

:(

  Report
 

bushidobadboy
Level 4

Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 15279

winkel wrote:

Any issue with this?

I mostly train alone and going to failure on weighted dips is much safer than getting stuck under a barbell. There are no power cages in my gym.

Current pecs routine (preceded by biceps):

Weighted leaning forward dips (5x5)
Incline HS press (3x8-12)
Flies or pec deck (3x10-15)

And no, replacing dips with a DB press variant is also not an option since the gym only has dumbbells up to 90lbs.

I'm shoulder and tricep dominant and I'm looking to beef up my chest so suggestions would be very welcome.



I would say that if you are shoulders and arms dominant, then dips would not primarily recruit pecs. However you know your body best.

You don't have to train to failure to induce hypertrophy. Try 4 sets of 12 reps of a 'guillotine press' (incline barbell to the neck press) as recommended by CT.

BBB

  Report
 

Josh Rider
Level 0

Join date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 318

bushidobadboy wrote:
winkel wrote:

You don't have to train to failure to induce hypertrophy. Try 4 sets of 12 reps of a 'guillotine press' (incline barbell to the neck press) as recommended by CT.

BBB



No, but you do have to overload your muscles sufficiently to induce hypertrophy. Four sets of 12 not to failure for a primary chest exercise sounds more like a cluster of warm up sets rather than a real workout. If your training above 8 reps, I don't see why you'd have to restrict failure altogether. Its one thing to push out 4-5 solid reps on heavy bench press and if you know you can't complete another rep to stop the set. Its another thing to take a light weight, throw up 12 reps with some difficulty, then at your 85% mark to failure (you could of probably completed 1 more rep on your own, 2-3 more with a spotter), you just easily rack the weight.

  Report
 

Trenchant
Level 1

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 688

Prefatigue pecs with flies so that you don't/can't lift as much when benching?

  Report
 

im_the_truth_
Level 0

Join date: Sep 2008
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 263

Personally I love dips more than any other chest exercise I get a much better pec stretch at the bottom and contraction at the top. They are my favorite upper body exercise and I find them more beneficial and safer than any bench exercise. Also since I follow HIT training to a extent and train alone its one of the only multi joint chest exercise that can be taken to failure and beyond by your self.

  Report
 

Josh Rider
Level 0

Join date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 318

Trenchant wrote:
Prefatigue pecs with flies so that you don't/can't lift as much when benching?


Probably a good idea. I agree that you could superset flyes with a press either as way to prefatigue or to "finish off."

  Report
 

rock27
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 311

winkel wrote:
Any issue with this?

I mostly train alone and going to failure on weighted dips is much safer than getting stuck under a barbell. There are no power cages in my gym.

Current pecs routine (preceded by biceps):

Weighted leaning forward dips (5x5)
Incline HS press (3x8-12)
Flies or pec deck (3x10-15)

And no, replacing dips with a DB press variant is also not an option since the gym only has dumbbells up to 90lbs.

I'm shoulder and tricep dominant and I'm looking to beef up my chest so suggestions would be very welcome.




I see no problems with dips as your primary excercies, however in my opinion there isn't enough in that w/o to make your chest grow(at max rate)
I would lower the amount of flies done or remove them completely until your chest is big enough to start etching detail into.
I would go dips for 5x5 as you have, then onto incline, and then maybe decline also(barbell) for sets of 6-8.

  Report
 

TheDudeAbides
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 3735

Can you not continue to train your chest but come short 1-2 reps before failure? Then do your dips to failure.

You could also add in weighted push-ups if you're into pre-fatigue.

  Report
 

PF_88
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2007
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 715

Gironda dips are the only dips that I really feel in my chest, parallel bar grip dips I mainly feel in my triceps, no matter how much of a forward lean i got. So for me, it would be a no, but if you feel it in yuor chest a lot, dips are a comound movement that you can easily progress on, I don't see why not.

  Report
 

bushidobadboy
Level 4

Join date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 15279

Josh Rider wrote:
bushidobadboy wrote:
winkel wrote:

You don't have to train to failure to induce hypertrophy. Try 4 sets of 12 reps of a 'guillotine press' (incline barbell to the neck press) as recommended by CT.

BBB



No, but you do have to overload your muscles sufficiently to induce hypertrophy. Four sets of 12 not to failure for a primary chest exercise sounds more like a cluster of warm up sets rather than a real workout.

If your training above 8 reps, I don't see why you'd have to restrict failure altogether. Its one thing to push out 4-5 solid reps on heavy bench press and if you know you can't complete another rep to stop the set.

Its another thing to take a light weight, throw up 12 reps with some difficulty, then at your 85% mark to failure (you could of probably completed 1 more rep on your own, 2-3 more with a spotter), you just easily rack the weight.


So you are saying that it's OK, to stop one rep short of a 4-5 rep set, but it's not OK to stop one rep short of a 12 rep set?

I disagree. 1 rep off 12 is less volume 'lost' than 1 rep from 5.

So stopping one rep short on a 12 rep set is closer to your intended target workout.

4 sets of 12 might sound like a woarmup to you but not all of us train heavy all the time, especially on an exercise like the guillotine press which can strain the shoulders more than a DB bench press.

Besides, the OP professes to be too nervous of harming himself under the bar to go to failure. He would surely be more confident using the lighter weight (which with sufficient reps can of course stimulate the muscle enough to grow) than the heavier one.

BBB

  Report
 

Josh Rider
Level 0

Join date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 318


bushidobadboy wrote:

No, but you do have to overload your muscles sufficiently to induce hypertrophy. Four sets of 12 not to failure for a primary chest exercise sounds more like a cluster of warm up sets rather than a real workout.

If your training above 8 reps, I don't see why you'd have to restrict failure altogether. Its one thing to push out 4-5 solid reps on heavy bench press and if you know you can't complete another rep to stop the set.

Its another thing to take a light weight, throw up 12 reps with some difficulty, then at your 85% mark to failure (you could of probably completed 1 more rep on your own, 2-3 more with a spotter), you just easily rack the weight.

So you are saying that it's OK, to stop one rep short of a 4-5 rep set, but it's not OK to stop one rep short of a 12 rep set?

I disagree. 1 rep off 12 is less volume 'lost' than 1 rep from 5.

So stopping one rep short on a 12 rep set is closer to your intended target workout.

4 sets of 12 might sound like a woarmup to you but not all of us train heavy all the time, especially on an exercise like the guillotine press which can strain the shoulders more than a DB bench press.

Besides, the OP professes to be too nervous of harming himself under the bar to go to failure. He would surely be more confident using the lighter weight (which with sufficient reps can of course stimulate the muscle enough to grow) than the heavier one.

BBB


Ya, I get what you are saying. I should rephrase my opinion to being that personally, for me, doing 4 x 12 not to failure wouldn't do much. With high reps such as that, not to go failure or near failure would mean doing 6+ sets in order to get as effective results as if say I did 4x10 to failure.

  Report
 

AngryVader
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 6350

I used to love dips, but my shoulders can't handle them these days. When I did do them, I preferred to put them towards the end of my chest workout so that my shoulders, chest and tris were nice and warmed up before doing them.

If you can handle doing them first, them more power to you, but I think it's better to put dips towards the end of your workout.

  Report
 

ja391
Level 4

Join date: May 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 18

winkel wrote:
I'm shoulder and tricep dominant and I'm looking to beef up my chest so suggestions would be very welcome.


As a few others stated already, if you're shoulder and tricep dominant, you're chest probaly wouldn't be recruited enough for noticeable hypertrophy. Although, I haven't really noticed much chest growth from weighted dips, my arms and shoulder's have grown a decent amount, and it's a great strength builder. So try them anyway.

  Report
 

winkel
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 94

Thanks for all your advice!

I do feel the dip in the chest so will keep that in. Good point about pre-exhausting to the point of not being able to use super heavy dumbbells. I figure that if I put DB press at the end of the workout and use higher reps, say 10-15 it will take me a while to run out of weights - so to speak.

  Report
 

PonceDeLeon
Level 3

Join date: Aug 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 6661

I feel dips because I am shoulder and arm dominant on chest exercises, and probably because my shoulders are generally rounded forward. I have begun to correct this, though, but I still feel it has a bearing on which exercises will hit my chest more.

Dips and close grip chinups absolutely hit my chest, as do low angle cable cross overs (coming from hips to lower chest, then crossing over).

Any higher angle and my front delts start to kick in.

  Report
 

MytchBucanan
Level 1

Join date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1125

As long as I can use wide enough bars and keep my chin tucked down, I get a really good chest workout from doing dips.

My gym has the older style dip bars. The type that fold to the inside (close for triceps) or fold out very wide (for chest). I find most fixed dip bars are not wide enough (even at the end if angled out) to get a good chest stretch and contraction. When this happens my shoulders and triceps tend to take over.

If you are interested in training negatives, dips are probably the easiest way to employ them. You don't need a partner as you simply step back up with whatever weight you have added and lower yourself under control.

  Report
 

the.israeli
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 73

I've been using dips for about 3 months now as primary chest exercise, seeing very good results. I work my back and chest on the same day, and it looks like this:

Bench
3st X 6rep

Weighted dips and close-grip pulldown superset
6st X 5-16rep
(5kg less with each set)

Bent-over row
3st X 6rp
(strict form, 75-80 degrees)

Dumbell flies
3st X 8rp

That works fantastic, especially the superset, though it's
tough as nails, really fucking hard. My pulse rises more than with my squats. I'm seeing much more improvement with my chest than I ever did, although it keeps my bench from progressing.

A friend of mine who's only 75kg on 1.75m (but is fairly ripped) had a period when his only chest exercise was weighted dips. He got to the point he could do full range with 60kg strapped on him for about 4-5 reps (respect), and had GREAT chest development. Plus, forgot to mention - that guy's starting point was about 57-58kg with the same height and fat ratio!

Neither of us is competing, we don't even take supplements. Shows you these kind of routines can work very well with normal individuals, considering they practice hard and eat and sleep well.

  Report
 

oark
Level 1

Join date: Dec 2008
Location:
Posts: 21

PonceDeLeon wrote:
I feel dips because I am shoulder and arm dominant on chest exercises, and probably because my shoulders are generally rounded forward. I have begun to correct this, though, but I still feel it...


ponce, how are you correcting for this? i read somewhere that keeping the shoulder blades back and down helps, but haven't tried it yet.

  Report
 

benmoore
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2007
Location: England
Posts: 977

Its one of the best movements going when loaded imo.

I would say however to avoid regulary pushing for heavy singles and doubles - maybe keep in the 3-5 rep range for fear of getting stuck in the bottom and blowing out the shoulder.

  Report
 

MytchBucanan
Level 1

Join date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1125

oark wrote:
PonceDeLeon wrote:
I feel dips because I am shoulder and arm dominant on chest exercises, and probably because my shoulders are generally rounded forward. I have begun to correct this, though, but I still feel it...

ponce, how are you correcting for this? i read somewhere that keeping the shoulder blades back and down helps, but haven't tried it yet.


Pinching the shoulder blades together emphasizes more chest for me as well. I notice this on bench presses as well as dips.

  Report
 

Lorisco
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2005
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2413

Dips are very close to decline bench or decline dumbbell press; both work the overall pecs better than flat bench or inclines.

So dips and/or decline work are your best bet for overall check development.

  Report
 

DoubleDuce
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 9124

Lorisco wrote:
Dips are very close to decline bench or decline dumbbell press; both work the overall pecs better than flat bench or inclines.

So dips and/or decline work are your best bet for overall check development.


I disagree. I personally feel the chest more in the bottom part of pressing movements (triceps on the top). Decline pressing removes a lot of the bottom portion of the movement.

In addition the angle of pressing on the decline bench (or dips) allows for a lot more lat involvement once again taking emphasis off the chest.

further, on dips, the neutral grip drives people to tuck their elbows a lot more than on normal pressing movements. This also allows for more shoulder and lat involvement I believe.

I love dips. I see them as a great overall upper body exercise. I however don't know that I would use them as a primary chest builder.

I'd figure out a way to get a spot or safety stops if it were me. Is there a smith machine?

  Report
 

plateau
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 1040

PonceDeLeon wrote:
close grip chinups absolutely hit my chest,


Chins? Really?

  Report
1 2 Next Last
Topic is Locked
This thread has reached its maximum number of replies. Click HERE to start a new topic.