The Intelligent & Relentless Pursuit of Muscle™
Get a Life
 
When Are Your Arms Considered Big?
1 2 Next Last
 

jtg987
Level

Join date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2426

I'm wondering when the general public see's someones arms and thinks they're big and then what do people on this site consider big?

i'll start I started getting comments when my arms were 16 inches, now they are 17.6 and i generally cant go out to a club with a t shirt on without getting a comment(not complaining when from a pretty lady)

funny that i do about 3 sets a week for biceps.....since i've been on a cut i havent lost any size on my arms, ok i'll stop feeling myself now...

so answers? i figure this is an easy free post thread, lets atleast try to answer the question within the first few posts

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

orion
Level 5

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 24757

When, after you have trained arms, you cannot touch your shoulder with your fingers because your bizeps gets in the way.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Neebone
Level

Join date: Jun 2006
Location: England
Posts: 323

What if you have really short fingers?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

cadav
Level

Join date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1945

i have shitty arms (my triceps are poorly shaped.. they are wide but without thickness) however i start getting comments passed 16inches (now i'm around 16.5)

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

cadav
Level

Join date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1945

Neebone wrote:
What if you have really short fingers?


LOL

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Razorslim
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 434

17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

jtg987
Level

Join date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2426

Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz


lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Razorslim
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 434

Your arms will grow with the rest of your body. I don't think avoiding direct arm work will keep them from getting bigger if you are trying to add mass to the rest of your body.

I've read that a good proportion is for your neck, arms, and calves to be the same size

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Duke
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 782

I started at 14.25" some years ago, now I'm at 17" and still want more.
I reckon 18" is a nice round number to aim for.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Cephalic_Carnage
Level 5

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 8850

jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile


Shoot yourself.
Seriously.

Nah man, keep doing arm work and just man up with the rest of your body.
Couple of warmups and one set each of Kroc Curls and the one shown here for Tris: http://www.larryscott.com/.../97summer_2.cfm will leave you plenty of time to improve the rest of your physique..

But in all honesty, I've never seen a bodybuilder with arms that were really too big for his body (even though ppl have accused Oliva, Levrone and McGrath of being "all arms", seriously those are/were some of the best looking dudes onstage. And it's not like you have arms like them anyway, right?).

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Cephalic_Carnage
Level 5

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 8850

Razorslim wrote:
Your arms will grow with the rest of your body. I don't think avoiding direct arm work will keep them from getting bigger if you are trying to add mass to the rest of your body.

I've read that a good proportion is for your neck, arms, and calves to be the same size


I typed up a lenghty response to this, but remembered that a certain big black man on this forum has already said everything that I could say to this in other threads.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Boffin
Level

Join date: Jun 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1313

18.3269814412322100004 ins

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

The Mighty Stu
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 9761

I think I gave my opinion on this a while ago on a different thread, but when I started training, my arms were 14" (and I thought I looked pretty 'athletic', from martial arts, boxing, and shotput). Once I reached 16", I felt that I looked like a 'bodybuilder', not just someone who played sports (I'm 5'9, with a pretty small boned frame, so of course this may be different for someone else). At 17", I thought I was hyooooge. At 18", I was honestly shocked, but couldn't really argue with any sincerity when someone would tell me that I had big arms (I always try to feign humility when complimented -lol).

I also do very little direct arm work. While I get a lot of questions about my tricep training, I figure it's just from years of heavy presses.


S

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Professor X
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 51898

The Mighty Stu wrote:
I think I gave my opinion on this a while ago on a different thread, but when I started training, my arms were 14" (and I thought I looked pretty 'athletic', from martial arts, boxing, and shotput). Once I reached 16", I felt that I looked like a 'bodybuilder', not just someone who played sports (I'm 5'9, with a pretty small boned frame, so of course this may be different for someone else). At 17", I thought I was hyooooge. At 18", I was honestly shocked, but couldn't really argue with any sincerity when someone would tell me that I had big arms (I always try to feign humility when complimented -lol).

I also do very little direct arm work. While I get a lot of questions about my tricep training, I figure it's just from years of heavy presses.


S


The general public seems to think anything much over 15" is big, especially if they are on a movie star. In bodybuilding, I think most would put that number over 17" with anything over 18" making you one of the few with the genetics to carry that much mass overall.

In general, if you can build lean arms over 18", it is a safe bet that you could possibly walk on stage and actually do well as a heavy weight or better instead of simply being looked over.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

analog_kid
Level

Join date: Oct 2004
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5533

jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile



Really?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

LiveFromThe781
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 10874

when evryone tells you theyre big and when you dont need to ask "when are arms considered big?".

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Professor X
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 51898

analog_kid wrote:
jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile


Really?



Yes. Really. I often tell myself this while speaking to my muscles as if they were living entities.

"Biceps, you seem a little TOO big for my body. Cutting the sleeves off of all of my dress shirts does not go over well at board meetings and driving with one arm hanging out of the window causes enough property damage to the concrete that I'll be paying back the city through 2025. Damn you, biceps. Damn you to hell."

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Cephalic_Carnage
Level 5

Join date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 8850

A true greek tragedy...

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Rockscar
Level 3

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: California, USA
Posts: 6076

Big is relative to the height of the individual. 14" arms can look "Big" to any average joe when someone is 5'3", so I don't think you can put a number on it.

For me, over 20" is impressive.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

jtg987
Level

Join date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2426

analog_kid wrote:
jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile


Really?



i try to avoid curls,so as i said earlier i generally do 3 sets a week as I'd rather do big heavy compound movements...it seems like my arms grow too easily at times, i would like too eventually get 18+...

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

juanjromero
Level

Join date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 720

Did your arms grow by so much rubbing your chest on your avatar? or do you really curl it?

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

shizen
Level 1

Join date: Feb 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2396

Hard to base just on pure #, since you can carry a lot of bodyfat and have big arms... but generally if you are pretty lean I think 17 is considered big. Hell I had a friend who was very lean with 15'' biceps and they looked pretty big to most people. He was fairly short though.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

Professor X
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 51898

jtg987 wrote:
analog_kid wrote:
jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile


Really?



i try to avoid curls,so as i said earlier i generally do 3 sets a week as I'd rather do big heavy compound movements...it seems like my arms grow too easily at times, i would like too eventually get 18+...


That makes sense...you want bigger arms...so you avoid working them directly because they grow too fast.

How much are they measuring now?

Your arms may have grown quickly up to this point, but from what I've seen, most of the guys with the genetics to build arms close to 20" would have popped up to 18 pretty quickly (as in 2-3 years). You may experience a lot more turbulence to actually reach that 18". Putting the breaks on now may not be the best decision you've made.

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

orion
Level 5

Join date: Jun 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 24757

Professor X wrote:
analog_kid wrote:
jtg987 wrote:
Razorslim wrote:
17 3/4 is the cutoff. Sorry jtg keep up with the curlz

lol, i believe my arms are too big for my body at the moment, so i wont be doing any direct arm work for awhile


Really?



Yes. Really. I often tell myself this while speaking to my muscles as if they were living entities.

"Biceps, you seem a little TOO big for my body. Cutting the sleeves off of all of my dress shirts does not go over well at board meetings and driving with one arm hanging out of the window causes enough property damage to the concrete that I'll be paying back the city through 2025. Damn you, biceps. Damn you to hell."


I have the exact same problem.

Admittedly somewhere else but try never to have had a BJ at Thirtyfi..

Damn, I hate my penis....

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
 

The Mighty Stu
Level 5

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 9761

When are MY arms considered big?

Just as soon as I wake up each morning -lol

S

  Post New Thread | Reply | Quote | Report
1 2 3 4 Next Last
Topic is Locked
This thread has reached its maximum number of replies. Click HERE to start a new topic.